In re: Saleem El-Amin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus [1000248452-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000260469-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [1000268893-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-04480. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000281411]. Mailed to: Saleem El-Amin. [18-1213]
Appeal: 18-1213
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/24/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1213
In re: SALEEM EL-AMIN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:17-cv-04480)
Submitted: April 19, 2018
Decided: April 24, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Saleem El-Amin, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 18-1213
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/24/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Saleem El-Amin, a D.C. Code Offender, petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act. Review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge issued his
Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation on March 2, 2018. El-Amin filed his
objections on March 9, 2018, and thereafter filed a number of motions that likewise
remain pending. We thus find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the
district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the
mandamus petition as supplemented. We also deny El-Amin’s motion for bail pending
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?