Redmond Howard v. Edward Russo

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-03948-GLR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000303438]. Mailed to: Jordan Geibel; Redmond Howard. [18-1244]

Appeal: 18-1244

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/30/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1244

REDMOND HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDWARD RUSSO; JORDAN GEIBEL; SCOTT HAMILTON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JEFFREY FLOYD; KAREN FLOYD; JONATHAN SCHMEDEL,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03948-GLR)

Submitted: May 24, 2018

Decided: May 30, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan Geibel, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 18-1244

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/30/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Redmond Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order addressing the various
motions Howard filed in a pending civil suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Howard seeks to appeal is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2