Celeste Broughton v. Walter Hinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [1000309589-2] Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00302-RE,14-07268-5-JNC,15-00053-5-JNC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000358276]. Mailed to: Zipporah Basile Edwards. [18-1255]

Appeal: 18-1255

Doc: 34

Filed: 08/30/2018

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1255

CELESTE G. BROUGHTON, a/k/a Celeste Gold Broughton,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee, on
behalf of the holders of the Alternative Loan Trust 2006-41CB, Morgan Pass
Through Certificates Series 2006-41CB; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;
CITIBANK, N.A.; WAKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Creditors - Appellees,
ESTATE OF ROBERT BROUGHTON,
Appellee,

WALTER L. HINSON,
Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00302-RE)

Submitted: August 23, 2018

Decided: August 30, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appeal: 18-1255

Doc: 34

Filed: 08/30/2018

Pg: 2 of 3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Celeste G. Broughton, Appellant Pro Se. William Sidney Aldridge, NICHOLLS &
CRAMPTON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Walter Lee Hinson, Jr., WALTER L.
HINSON P.A., Wilson, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 18-1255

Doc: 34

Filed: 08/30/2018

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Celeste G. Broughton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her
motions to reconsider several of the court’s previous orders in Broughton’s ongoing
bankruptcy proceeding, and granting Broughton’s request for an extension of time in
which to seek reconsideration of other orders. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Broughton seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Broughton’s motion to amend the caption. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

3