William Taccino v. Commissioner, Social Security

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [1000317959-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02112-GLR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000320778]. Mailed to: William A. Taccino 402 Pine Avenue Cumberland, MD 21502. [18-1294, 18-1295]

Appeal: 18-1294

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/28/2018

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1294

WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF
MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellees.

No. 18-1295

WILLIAM ANTHONY TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ORGANIZING FOR ACTION WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Volunteer,
Plaintiff,

Appeal: 18-1294

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/28/2018

Pg: 2 of 3

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS AND
AGENCIES; PRESIDENT OF THE U. S. A. DONALD TRUMP; STATE OF
WEST VIRGINIA; WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR JIM JUSTICE; STATE OF
MARYLAND; MARYLAND GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN; SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02112-GLR)

Submitted: June 20, 2018

Decided: June 28, 2018

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 18-1294

Doc: 9

Filed: 06/28/2018

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
William Anthony Taccino appeals the district court’s orders adopting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his
application for disability insurance benefits, and denying reconsideration.

We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Taccino v. Comm’r Soc. Sec., No. 1:14-cv-02112-GLR (D.
Md. Jan. 18, 2018; Feb. 23, 2018). We deny Taccino’s motion for default judgment and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

3