Roderick Hall v. Sprint Corporation

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:18-cv-00024-RJC-DSC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000332035].. [18-1309]

Appeal: 18-1309

Doc: 6

Filed: 07/19/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1309

RODERICK JERMAINE HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SPRINT CORPORATION, d/b/a Sprint,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00024-RJC-DSC)

Submitted: July 10, 2018

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Jermaine Hall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: July 19, 2018

Appeal: 18-1309

Doc: 6

Filed: 07/19/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Roderick Jermaine Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review
to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hall’s
informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, Hall has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170,
177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit
rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2