Burl Anderson Howell v. George A. Wood

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:17-cv-00093-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000332921]. Mailed to: Brenda Eaddy; Alice A. Howell; Burl Anderson Howell; Scott C. Hurt; Rajeev K. Premakumar. [18-1315]

Appeal: 18-1315

Doc: 14

Filed: 07/20/2018

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1315

BURL ANDERSON HOWELL; ALICE ANNETTE HOWELL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GEORGE A. WOOD, County Manager for the Wayne County NC Department of
Social Services (WCNCDSS) in his managerial capacity for injunctive relief;
RESEE PHELPS, Income Maintenance Supervisor for WCNCDSS sued in her
individual and official capacities for monetary and equitable relief; LOU JONES,
Case Worker for WCNCDSS sued directly in her individual for same; EDWARD S.
FELTMAN, State Hearing Officer for WCNCDSS in his individual capacity;
MANDY COHEN, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Health and Human
Services sued in her official capacity for declaratory relief,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00093-BO)

Submitted: July 17, 2018

Decided: July 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Burl Anderson Howell, Alice A. Howell, Appellants Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North Carolina,

Appeal: 18-1315

Doc: 14

Filed: 07/20/2018

Pg: 2 of 3

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 18-1315

Doc: 14

Filed: 07/20/2018

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell appeal the district court’s orders
denying their motions, granting Defendants’ motions, and dismissing their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. Wood,
No. 5:17-cv-00093-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2018; Dec. 21, 2017; filed Sept. 9, 2017,
entered Sept. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3