Mary Diggs v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000281518-2]. Originating case number: 6:17-cv-00026-NKM-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000355423]. Mailed to: Mary Diggs. [18-1349]

Appeal: 18-1349

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/27/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1349

MARY A. DIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP; WAL-MART STORES, INC., d/b/a Wal-Mart
Supercenter #2565, a/k/a Wal-Mart, a/k/a Wal-Mart Store, a/k/a Wal-Mart
Supercenter,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:17-cv-00026-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: August 23, 2018

Decided: August 27, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary A. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Kailani Memmer, Victor S. Skaff, III,
GLENN ROBINSON CATHEY MEMMER & SKAFF PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 18-1349

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/27/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Mary A. Diggs appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, on Diggs’ civil suit based on diversity jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district
court. Diggs v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, No. 6:17-cv-00026-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va.
Mar. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2