Vinita Johnson v. Nancy Berryhill


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000272338-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000297278-2]. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00923-HEH-DJN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000339356]. Mailed to: Vinita Johnson. [18-1375]

Download PDF
Appeal: 18-1375 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/31/2018 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1375 VINITA JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee, and ERIN MCNEILL, Assistant Attorney General for Commonwealth of Virginia; JOHNSON CONTROLS CORPORATE OFFICE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00923-HEH-DJN) Submitted: July 24, 2018 Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vinita Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Decided: July 31, 2018 Appeal: 18-1375 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/31/2018 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 18-1375 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/31/2018 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Vinita Johnson appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge, granting Nancy A. Berryhill’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissing Johnson’s amended complaint as to the remaining Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Berryhill, No. 3:16-cv-00923-HEH-DJN (E.D. Va. June 16, 2017; Sept. 28, 2017; Mar. 22, 2018). We deny Johnson’s motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?