Deutsch Bank National Company v. Margaret Fegely
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00147-MHL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000313574]. Mailed to: Margaret Fegely. [18-1456]
Appeal: 18-1456
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/18/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1456
DEUTSCH BANK NATIONAL COMPANY, as Trustee for INDYMAC INDX
Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR12, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series
2006-AR12,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARGARET FEGELY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00147-MHL)
Submitted: June 14, 2018
Decided: June 18, 2018
Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Margaret Fegely, Appellant Pro Se. Abby Kelley Moynihan, MCCABE WEISBERG &
CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 18-1456
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/18/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Fegely seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Fegely seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?