US v. Gregory D. Anderson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cr-00260-MOC-DSC-1,3:17-cv-00236-MOC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000314503]. Mailed to: Gregory Anderson. [18-6194]

Appeal: 18-6194

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/19/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6194

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GREGORY D. ANDERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cr-00260-MOC-DSC-1; 3:17cv-00236-MOC)

Submitted: June 14, 2018

Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory D. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: June 18, 2018

Appeal: 18-6194

Doc: 12

Filed: 06/19/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Gregory D. Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying without
prejudice his motion for leave to supplement his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and his
motion alleging fraud on the court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Anderson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2