Joseph Fleming v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00410-JLK-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000281364]. Mailed to: Joseph Fleming. [18-6210]

Download PDF
Appeal: 18-6210 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/24/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6210 JOSEPH FLEMING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC; JOHN WALRATH, Warden; C/O LUNDY; C/O DEAN; NURSE CRAWFORD; MCBRIDE, Unit Manager; NURSE PARKS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00410-JLK-RSB) Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees Nurse Crawford and Nurse Parks. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 18-6210 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/24/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Fleming seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ summary judgment motions filed in his pending 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Fleming seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?