Chauncey Demetrius Bennett v. Warden John Wolfe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000290311-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-04069-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000332877]. Mailed to: Bennett. [18-6226]

Appeal: 18-6226

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/20/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6226

CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE; LIBRARIAN JUNE BRITTINGHAM; L.T.
VANESSA JONES; SECRETARY STEPHEN MOYER; COMMISSIONER
DAYENA CORCORAN; COMMISSIONER CAROLYN SCRUGS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-04069-JKB)

Submitted: July 17, 2018

Decided: July 20, 2018

Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 18-6226

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/20/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court’s order granting
defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Bennett’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint, and dismissing his claim challenging his infraction without prejudice. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. Wolfe, No. 1:16-cv-04069-JKB (D. Md.
Feb. 20, 2018). We deny Bennett’s motion to order defendants to provide a copying card
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2