Samuel Wilder v. Tarcia James

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-01457-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000334052]. Mailed to: Samuel Wilder. [18-6275]

Appeal: 18-6275

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/23/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6275

SAMUEL ANTHONY WILDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TARCIA L. JAMES, in her individual capacity as Nurse at McCormick
Correctional Institution; KELLIE L. BREWER, in her individual capacity as
Nurse at McCormick Correctional Institution; ASIA FEW, in her individual
capacity as Correctional Officer at McCormick Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:16-cv-01457-CMC)

Submitted: July 19, 2018

Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Anthony Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD,
PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 18-6275

Doc: 12

Filed: 07/23/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Samuel Anthony Wilder appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file
objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Wilder filed these
motions for relief in his proceedings on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, which the
court dismissed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. James, No. 2:16-cv01457-CMC (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 2018; Jan. 31, 2018; Feb. 6, 2018; Mar. 19, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

2