Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000351482]. Mailed to: Charles Tunstall. [18-6285]
Appeal: 18-6285
Doc: 13
Filed: 08/20/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6285
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, RN; DR. SAMI HASSAN; JANE
WELCH, Head Nurse; MS. PADGEANT; LETITIA OWENS; CAPTAIN
BROCKINGTON; MS. FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DR. CHARLES STEWART; PETER WOGLOM; DR ARTHUR DAVIS; DR.
SAMUEL MICKLOS; DR. KEYSER; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: August 16, 2018
Decided: August 20, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 18-6285
Doc: 13
Filed: 08/20/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 18-6285
Doc: 13
Filed: 08/20/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No.
1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016; June 22, 2017; Jan. 5, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?