US v. Scott Pierce

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [1000274451-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cr-00053-MFU-RSB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000297643]. Mailed to: Scott Pierce. [18-6303]

Appeal: 18-6303

Doc: 7

Filed: 05/21/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SCOTT MATTHEW PIERCE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (5:14-cr-00053-MFU-RSB-1)

Submitted: May 17, 2018

Decided: May 21, 2018

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Matthew Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Marie Harrigan Kulpa, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 18-6303

Doc: 7

Filed: 05/21/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Scott Matthew Pierce appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the
Sentencing Guidelines.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Pierce’s motion for transcript and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court in the “Additional Comments” section of the order. See United States v.
Pierce, No. 5:14-cr-00053-MFU-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2