Ryricka Custis v. Earl Barksdale

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000319918]. Mailed to: Ryricka Nikita Custis. [18-6308]

Download PDF
Appeal: 18-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2018 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6308 RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EARL BARKSDALE, Warden Red Onion State Prison; M. YOUNCE, A Building Unit Manager Red Onion State Prison; I. EDWARDS, Records Department Red Onion State Prison; P. HARLESS, Medical Department Red Onion State Prison; E. SOWARDS, Defendants - Appellees, and HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC; H. SMITH, Doctor Red Onion State Prison, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 18-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2018 Pg: 2 of 3 Ryricka Nikita Custis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 18-6308 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2018 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Ryricka Nikita Custis appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Custis v. Barksdale, No. 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?