Ryricka Custis v. Earl Barksdale
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000319918]. Mailed to: Ryricka Nikita Custis. [18-6308]
Appeal: 18-6308
Doc: 10
Filed: 06/27/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6308
RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EARL BARKSDALE, Warden Red Onion State Prison; M. YOUNCE, A Building
Unit Manager Red Onion State Prison; I. EDWARDS, Records Department Red
Onion State Prison; P. HARLESS, Medical Department Red Onion State Prison; E.
SOWARDS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC; H. SMITH, Doctor Red Onion State
Prison,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB)
Submitted: June 20, 2018
Decided: June 27, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 18-6308
Doc: 10
Filed: 06/27/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Ryricka Nikita Custis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 18-6308
Doc: 10
Filed: 06/27/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Ryricka Nikita Custis appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Custis v. Barksdale, No. 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB
(W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?