US v. Maurice Moore, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [1000284320-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000284320-3]. Originating case number: 4:16-cr-00025-H-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000314488]. Mailed to: Maurice Eugene Moore Jr.. [18-6380]

Download PDF
Appeal: 18-6380 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/19/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6380 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAURICE EUGENE MOORE, JR., a/k/a MJ, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:16-cr-00025-H-1) Submitted: June 14, 2018 Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Eugene Moore, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 19, 2018 Appeal: 18-6380 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/19/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Maurice Eugene Moore, Jr., pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin and possession of ammunition by a felon, and was sentenced to 300 months’ imprisonment. In December 2017, we affirmed Moore’s criminal judgment on direct appeal. United States v. Moore, 706 F. App’x 141, 143 (4th Cir. 2017) (No. 17-4254). In April 2018, Moore filed a second notice of appeal of the same criminal judgment. Because we previously affirmed this criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative, and deny Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel and for transcripts at the Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?