Courtney Lyles v. Bryan Sterling
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:17-cv-00149-CMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency . Mailed to: Courtney Lyles. [18-6512]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
BRYAN STERLING; MICHAEL MCCALL; LEWIS; FLORENCE MAUNEY;
STEPHEN CLAYTOR; DEGEORGES, Captain; BENNETT; SWINGER;
VALERO; TUCKER; MITCHELL; OFFICER EDGERTON; ROBINSON,
Coach; WARDEN CARTLEDGE; MISKINIS, Corporal; ROBERT OLSEN;
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (9:17-cv-00149-CMC)
Submitted: August 16, 2018
Decided: August 21, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE
& MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Courtney Lyles appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lyles v. Sterling, No. 9:17-cv-00149-CMC (D.S.C.
Apr. 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?