Sundari Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000334931]. Mailed to: Prasad. [18-6576]
Appeal: 18-6576
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/24/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6576
SUNDARI K. PRASAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOXMORE PROCESS SERVERS; MICHAEL FOXMORE, Owner of Foxmore
Servers,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00041-MHL-RCY)
Submitted: July 19, 2018
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: July 24, 2018
Appeal: 18-6576
Doc: 9
Filed: 07/24/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Prasad v. Foxmore Process Servers, No. 3:17-cv00041-MHL-RCY (E.D. Va. May 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?