Fred Carswell, III v. G. Ramirez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000314896-2] Originating case number: 4:17-cv-01231-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000339429]. Mailed to: F. Carswell, III. [18-6603]
Appeal: 18-6603
Doc: 7
Filed: 07/31/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6603
FRED CARSWELL, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
G. RAMIREZ, Warden FCI Williamsburg,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01231-BHH)
Submitted: July 26, 2018
Decided: July 31, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fred Carswell, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 18-6603
Doc: 7
Filed: 07/31/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Fred Carswell, III a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Carswell v. Ramirez, No. 4:17-cv-01231-BHH (D.S.C. May 15, 2018).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?