Fred Carswell, III v. G. Ramirez

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000314896-2] Originating case number: 4:17-cv-01231-BHH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000339429]. Mailed to: F. Carswell, III. [18-6603]

Download PDF
Appeal: 18-6603 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/31/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6603 FRED CARSWELL, III, Petitioner - Appellant, v. G. RAMIREZ, Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01231-BHH) Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Carswell, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 18-6603 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/31/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Fred Carswell, III a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carswell v. Ramirez, No. 4:17-cv-01231-BHH (D.S.C. May 15, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?