USA v. Sypniewiski
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11262 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEBORAH LEE SYPNIEWISKI, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-28-1 -------------------Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Deborah Lee Sypniewiski was convicted by a jury of counterfeiting obligations of the United States and possessing counterfeit obligations. Sypniewiski argues that the district
court erred in enhancing her sentence based on her manufacture of counterfeit federal reserve notes pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1(b)(2)(A) and (b)(3) (2004). Sypniewiski argues that the
enhancement was inapplicable under application note 4, which states that the enhancement does not apply where the items manufactured "are so obviously counterfeit that they are unlikely Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-11262 -2to be accepted even if subjected to only minimal scrutiny." § 2B5.1, comment. (n.4). Based on the personal inspection of the notes by the district court judge, the evidence regarding the number of times the bills were successfully and unsuccessfully passed, and the testimony of various witnesses including a Secret Service agent, the district court found that the counterfeit notes were not so obviously counterfeit that they were unlikely to be accepted even if subjected to only minimal scrutiny. The district court's
finding was plausible in light of the record as a whole and thus was not clearly erroneous. United States v. Wyjack, 141 F.3d
181, 183-84 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Bollman, 141 F.3d 184, 187 (5th Cir. 1998). AFFIRMED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?