USA v. Allbritton

Filing 920070321

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30392 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUDY B. ALLBRITTON, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:03-CR-10025-1 -------------------Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Judy B. Allbritton was convicted after a jury trial on four counts of making false entries in a bank book, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005, and four counts of misapplication of monies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656. notice of appeal. Allbritton did not file a timely

Instead, she filed several post-judgment

motions seeking extensions of time to file a notice of appeal, reconsideration of the district court's denial of an extension of time, and an out-of-time appeal. The district court denied each She then filed a notice

of Allbritton's post-judgment motions.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 05-30392 -2of appeal purporting to appeal from the district court's orders but has not briefed the denial of her motions. Allbritton's

notice of appeal was not timely as to any of the district court's orders. The appeal is therefore dismissed for failure to comply See Burnley

with the rule requiring a timely notice of appeal.

v. City of San Antonio, 470 F.3d 189, 192 n.1 (5th Cir. 2006); FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). APPEAL DISMISSED.