Turnbow v. Social Sec Admin
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 05-30901 Summary Calendar
F I L E D
March 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
WANDA TURNBOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (3:04-CV-01377-RGJ-JDK) Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant Wanda Turnbow appeals the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation that the judgment of the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denying her application for disability benefits be affirmed. Turnbow's primary argument on appeal is that the SSA Appeals Council and the
magistrate judge erred in not considering the new evidence that she presented to the Appeals Council after the administrative law judge Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
rendered her opinion.
Turnbow's argument is without merit: Under
Higginbotham v. Barnhart, a district court should review additional information that a petitioner submits to the Appeals Council after the ALJ has reached a decision.1 Under Falco v. Shalala, however,
this rule applies only if the new information relates to the time period for which the benefits were sought.2 Thus, the Appeals
Council and the district court are under no obligation to review information submitted for the first time to the Appeals Council when, as here, it relates only to the subsequent deterioration of a previously non-disabling condition. The remainder of Turnbow's arguments on appeal are without merit; and, after reviewing the record, we affirm for the reasons given by the magistrate judge. AFFIRMED.
405 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2005). 27 F.3d 160, 164 (5th Cir. 1994). 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?