USA v. Frazier

Filing 920060621

Opinion

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT F I L E D June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40600 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO DEWAYNE FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CV-105 USDC No. 3:95-CR-10-3 -------------------Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Dewayne Frazier, federal prisoner # 46222-079, was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and 50 grams or more of cocaine base and was sentenced to 402 months of imprisonment. Frazier filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in 2001, which was dismissed as time-barred. Frazier filed a second § 2255 motion in 2005, arguing that his sentence was unconstitutional in light Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * No. 05-40600 -2of the decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). The district court dismissed Frazier's motion as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion but granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the issue whether Booker is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Booker does not apply retroactively to cases on initial collateral review. (5th Cir. 2005). United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604 Further, Booker is not a ground for filing a In re Elwood, 408 F.3d 211, 213 (5th successive § 2255 motion. Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Frazier's motion to stay proceedings is DENIED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?