Kapisauanhu v. Gonzales

Filing 920060720

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

F I L E D
July 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 05-60978 Summary Calendar TAWUYA KAPISAUANHU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. -------------------Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A96 282 062 -------------------Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Tawuya Kapisauanhu, a native and citizen of Zimbabwe, has petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge's (IJ) decision denying her application for asylum, for withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Kapisauanhu contends that her application for asylum application was wrongly denied as untimely. jurisdiction to review this claim. This court lacks

See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3);

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

*

No. 05-60978 -2Zhu v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 521, 527 (5th Cir. 2005). this portion of the petition for review is DISMISSED. With respect to the denial of withholding of removal, Kapisauanhu has failed to show that the record compels reversal of the finding of the BIA and IJ that she failed to give credible testimony that she is entitled to withholding of removal. Chun Accordingly,

v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994); Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997). With respect to the denial of relief

under the CAT, Kapisauanhu has abandoned any challenge to the denial of that relief. n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). See Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 The remainder of the petition seeking

review of the BIA's affirmance of the IJ's denial of the application for withholding of removal and relief under the CAT is DENIED.