Varela v. Sommers
Filing
920070523
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 23, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Summary Calendar No. 06-20978 In The Matter of: CONTRACTOR TECHNOLOGY LTD. Debtor -------------------CIPRIANO G VARELA, doing business as Gube Trucking Plaintiff - Appellant v. RONALD J SOMMERS Defendant - Appellee -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston USDC No. 4:06-CV-2477 -------------------Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm the district court's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's judgment avoiding unauthorized post-petition transfers under 11 U.S.C. § 549 in the amount of $85,456.35. Both courts correctly concluded that the funds held in the debtor's bank account on the petition date were property of the estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541 because, at a minimum, legal title to the funds was held by the debtor. The plaintiff-appellant's
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
No. 06-20978 -2assertion that the funds at issue were trust funds under the Texas Trust Fund Statute and therefore excludable from property of the estate is, as the trustee argues, premature. The issue of
whether a trust exists and the identity of its beneficiaries remains to be litigated. The plaintiff-appellant will have his The other matter that the plaintiff-
day in court on that issue.
appellant would like to pursue is whether the funds at issue were held by the debtor "as of the commencement of the case." question, which is fact-intensive, was not raised in the bankruptcy court and is not properly before us. AFFIRMED. That
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?