Nixon v. Young, et al

Filing 920061024

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30070 Conference Calendar JIMMY G. NIXON, SR., Petitioner-Appellant, versus JOE YOUNG; MS. ENDENFIELD; SHAWN MILLION; K. SCHWINN; R. POOLE; MR. MCCLAIN; DOES 1-10, Respondents-Appellees. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CV-650 -------------------Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jimmy G. Nixon, Sr., federal prisoner # 12863-116, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction. Nixon challenged his conviction and

sentence for mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and illegal monetary transactions. Nixon has not argued, much less shown, that he is entitled to proceed under § 2241 based on the "savings clause" of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893,

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

*

No. 06-30070 -2900-01, 904 (5th Cir. 2001); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). court's judgment is AFFIRMED. The district