Clark v. USA
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 06-30932 Summary Calendar MABON CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Case No. 6:05-CV-1853 _________________________________________________________________ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* While hospitalized at a Veterans Administration ("VA") hospital in Alexandria, Louisiana, in 2001, Appellant Mabon Clark alleges that he was negligently over-medicated and fell, causing him permanent mental and physical impairment. Clark filed a February 16, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
personal injury claim with the VA under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), on September 23, 2002. See 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The
VA's Regional Counsel denied the claim on March 10, 2004, and the Office of General Counsel denied it on review. The VA General
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Counsel informed Clark in a notice dated February 16, 2005, that he could file suit in federal district court within the six-month statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b). That six-month
period expired on August 16.
Clark, however, did not file suit
until October 25, more than two months late. We find no support for Clark's argument that his untimely filed lawsuit is nonetheless preserved because the circumstances of the instant case merit equitable tolling. See Clymore v. United
States, 217 F.3d 370 (5th Cir. 2000); Perez v. United States, 167 F.3d 913 (5th Cir. 1999). Clymore and Perez stand for the
proposition that equitable tolling is available to plaintiffs who "actively pleading." 917). pursued judicial remedies but filed a defective
Clymore, 217 F.3d at 375 (quoting Perez, 167 F.3d at
Clark does not fall within this holding. Moreover, Clark's asserted participation in ongoing
settlement negotiations with the VA is irrelevant to the operation of equitable tolling because he has offered no evidence of
misconduct on the part of the VA.1
See Perez, 167 F.3d at 917
(equitable tolling appropriate when "the complainant has been induced or tricked by his adversary's misconduct into allowing the filing deadline to pass."). Finally, although his counsel's
untimely filing mistake was unfortunate, such mistakes do not In the district court, he argued that the chaos created by Hurricane Katrina justifies equitable tolling, but the storm made landfall thirteen days after the August 16 filing deadline elapsed. 2
equitably toll the FTCA's limitations period.
of equitable estoppel and the doctrine of laches are likewise entirely inapplicable to this case. The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?