USA v. Haro-Torres
Filing
USA v. Haro-Torres
Doc. 0
Case: 06-31093
Document: 00511174065
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/15/2010
United States Court of Appeals F if t h Circuit
FILED
REVISED JULY 15, 2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-31093 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MAURO ALEJANDRO HARO-TORRES, also known as Julian Montez, also known as Jose Rivera-Garcia, also known as Luis Rojo Lopez, also known as Mario Flores, also known as Julian Montez Villegas, also known as Luis Fojo Lopez, also known as Luis Rojo, also known as Mario Lopez-Gomez, also known as Julian Montes-Villegas, also known as Julian Montes Villehas, also known as Jullan Montez Villegas, also known as Mauro Alejandr Torez, also known as Mario Gomez-Lopez, also known as Fernando Medivil Zavala, also known as Juli Villegas, also known as Julian Motes-Villegas, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-131-ALL -------------------Before SMITH, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauro Alejandro Haro-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 06-31093
Document: 00511174065
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/15/2010
No. 06-31093 -2738 (1967). Haro-Torres has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. CIR. R. 42.2. See 5TH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?