USA v. Molina
Filing
920070806
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 06-40025 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROLANDO MOLINA Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (2:05-CV-536) (2:94-CR-199-4) Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Having been granted a certificate of appealability, Rolando Molina contests the dismissal, as successive, of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the district court's 2005 amended judgment of conviction. As reflected in the record, the district court intended to impose a supervised-release term of more than one year for counts one and two. See United States v. De La Pena-Juarez, 214 F.3d 594,
601 (5th Cir. 2000) (when a written sentence and oral pronouncement Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
conflict, the oral pronouncement generally governs, but "it is the district court's intention that ultimately determines the final judgment"). a specific The district court was statutorily mandated to impose term of release for each count. 21 U.S.C. §
841(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(1)(B)(ii)(II). There was an ambiguity between the oral and written judgments; therefore, the district court was authorized under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct what was either "a clerical error in [the] judgment, ... or ... an error in the record arising from oversight or omission". CRIM. P. 36; see De La Pena-Juarez, 214 F.3d at 601. the amended judgment merely modified the FED. R.
Accordingly, original
existing,
sentence, which Molina challenged under § 2255 in 1997. Therefore, his 2005 § 2255 motion was successive. AFFIRMED; MOTION TO EXPAND THE GRANT OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?