Reese v. US Bureau of Prisons, et al
Filing
920071004
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 06-40617 Summary Calendar BRIAN C REESE Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; THREE RIVERS TEXAS FACILITY; WARDEN JOE DRIVER Defendants-Appellees
October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CV-452
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Brian C. Reese, federal prisoner # 69187-080, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application. He argues that the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") has improperly determined that his federal sentences for conspiracy to manufacture 100 grams or more of methamphetamine and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon run consecutively to his state sentence. The district court did not err by concluding that his federal sentences were to operate
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
No. 06-40617 consecutively to his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); Leal v. Tombone, 341 F.3d 427, 427-30 (5th Cir. 2003); Free v. Miles, 333 F.3d 550, 553 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1217 (5th Cir. 1991). Reese also argues that he is entitled to credit against his federal sentences for his time served in state custody after the imposition of his federal sentences. Reese is not entitled to credit on his federal sentence because the time at issue was credited toward his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); Causey v. Civiletti, 621 F.2d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1980). The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?