USA v. Flores
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51424 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN MICHAEL FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:06-CR-155-ALL -------------------Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Martin Michael Flores has appealed the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release. Flores
argues that his 24-month sentence is unreasonable because it is above the advisory guideline range and the sentencing factors cited by the district court are taken into account by the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Flores's sentence. See United The
States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001).
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-51424 -2sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006). AFFIRMED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?