Loyola-Gomez v. Gonzales
Filing
920070906
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
No. 06-60649 Summary Calendar RAFAEL LOYOLA-GOMEZ, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R GONZALES, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A77 405 242
Before KING, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rafael Loyola-Gomez (Loyola) petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial of an adjustment of status. Loyola argues that the BIA violated his procedural due process rights when it refused to exercise its discretion to accept his out-of-time appellate brief. The brief was submitted several days late and was accompanied by an untimely request for an extension of the filing time. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
The relief sought by Loyola (namely, an adjustment of status to that of a legal permanent resident) is discretionary in nature and is not afforded due process protection. See Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 440 (5th 2006). To the extent that Loyola argues that the BIA erred in affirming the denial of an adjustment of status, we lack jurisdiction to review that decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Wilmore v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 524, 528-29 (5th Cir. 2006) . PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?