USA v. Robles
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 07-51419 Summary Calendar
July 15, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. NORA JOSEFINA ROBLES Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-1559-ALL
Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Nora Josefina Robles appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction of importation of marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and illegal reentry. She argues that the district court clearly erred by denying her motion for a two-level reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) because she had a minor role in the offense. A Section 3B1.2 reduction applies only when a defendant is substantially less culpable than the average participant. United States v. Villanueva, 408
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 07-51419 F.3d 193, 203 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2005). Robles's courier status alone did not entitle her to a role adjustment because a defendant may be a courier without being "substantially less culpable than the average participant." United States v. Brown, 54 F.3d 234, 241 (5th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (emphasis in original). If a sentence is based on activity in which a defendant was actually involved, Section 3B1.2 does not require a reduction in the base offense level even though the defendant's activity in a larger conspiracy may have been minor. United States v. Atanda, 60 F.3d 196, 199 (5th Cir. 1995). Robles admitted to transporting 40.47 kilograms of marijuana across the border and she admitted that she suspected that the vehicle that she was driving across the border contained the drugs. Her sentence was based on the amount of drugs which were present in the vehicle. Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err in denying her request for a reduction based on her role in the offense. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?