USA v. Davis
Filing
920090917
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
No. 08-20601 Summary Calendar September 17, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROBERT DANIEL DAVIS Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-140-1
Before KING, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Robert Daniel Davis, federal prisoner # 97410-079, appeals the district court's dismissal of his motion to vacate as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Davis's motion to vacate sought to challenge his 2001 conviction and sentence due to lack of subject matter and territorial jurisdiction. Thus, the motion was properly construed as arising under § 2255. See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th Cir. 2000). Because Davis's motion was properly construed as arising under § 2255, this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
*
No. 08-20601 appeal absent a certificate of appealability (COA) ruling in the district court. See United States v. Youngblood, 116 F.3d 1113, 1114-15 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court did not construe Davis's notice of appeal as a COA request. However, this court declines to remand this case in light of the patent frivolity of Davis's appeal. See United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the instant appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?