Bryson v. Keffer, et al

Filing 920091215

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-30891 Conference Calendar December 15, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk WILLIAM M BRYSON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant v. JOE KEFFER; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EXECUTIVE OFFICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:08-CV-960 Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William M. Bryson, Jr., federal prisoner # 95662-071, appeals the striking of his pleadings for failure to comply with the sanction order issued in Bryson v. United States, No. 1:08-CV-0142 (W.D. La. Mar. 25, 2008). Bryson argues that the district court abused its discretion in construing his pleadings as a request for 28 U.S.C. § 2241 relief and, as such, abused its discretion in enforcing the earlier-imposed sanctions. Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. * No. 08-30891 The sanction order in Bryson v. United States, No. 1:08-CV-0142, specified that, on account of his filing numerous frivolous collateral challenges to his sentence, Bryson was required to pay a $100 fine and seek written authorization from a district judge before filing "any pleading." The district court's construction of Bryson's pleadings was therefore not germane to its order striking them. Bryson made no attempt to comply with this order, and his appeal from the sanction order was dismissed. The record discloses no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court. See Gelabert v. Lynaugh, 894 F.2d 746, 747-48 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?