USA v. Joseph

Filing 920091020

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-40733 Conference Calendar October 20, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LARRY JOSEPH, JR., Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-26-1 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Joseph, Jr., federal prisoner # 10774-078, was sentenced to 151 months in prison following his plea of guilty to possession with the intent to distribute more than five grams, but less than 50 grams, of cocaine base (crack). Following amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered the offense levels for crack cocaine offenses, the district court granted a motion by Joseph Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. * No. 08-40733 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and reduced his sentence to 130 months, which was at the bottom of the amended guidelines range. Joseph now appeals, arguing that the district court's failure to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors or a sentence below the amended guidelines range when it resentenced him violated United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). Joseph's arguments are foreclosed in light of our recent decision in United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, the Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the Government's motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?