USA v. Fuentes-Gomez
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
No. 08-41297 Conference Calendar August 18, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARGARITA DEL ROSARIO FUENTES-GOMEZ, also known as Margarita Torres, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:08-CR-1191-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Margarita Del Rosario Fuentes-Gomez (Fuentes) pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry after deportation following a felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). She appeals her within-guidelines sentence of 37 months of imprisonment, arguing that the sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to provide adequate reasons to explain its choice of sentence.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.
No. 08-41297 As Fuentes failed to object at sentencing, this court reviews for plain error. See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (June 24, 2009) (No. 08-11099). To demonstrate plain error, Fuentes must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and affects her substantial rights. See id. If these conditions are met, this court may exercise its discretion to correct the error if it "seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings." Id. (citation omitted). As Fuentes concedes, there is nothing in the record to indicate that Fuentes's sentence would have been different if the court had provided more explanation for its choice of sentence. Fuentes has thus failed to demonstrate error affecting her substantial rights. See id. at 364-65. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?