USA v. Almodovar-Olivas

Filing 920090910

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-50754 Summary Calendar September 10, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS ALMODOVAR-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-70-3 Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jesus Almodovar-Olivas was convicted of one count of aiding and abetting possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The district court sentenced him to serve 46 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. In this appeal, Almodovar-Olivas argues that his sentence should have been based solely on the marijuana that he knew to be involved with his offense. He maintains that he had no knowledge of the methamphetamine that was also Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. * No. 08-50754 involved with his offense, and he argues he should not have been held responsible for the methamphetamine at sentencing because he was unaware of it and had not agreed to be involved with it. We conduct a de novo review of the district court's application and interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines, and its factual findings are reviewed for clear error. See United States v. CisnerosGutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). Almodovar-Olivas has shown no error in connection with his sentence. A defendant need not have knowledge of the type of drug he is carrying in order for the drug to be used in the calculation of his sentence. United States v. GamezGonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999). Almodovar-Olivas's arguments to the contrary are unavailing. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?