Bowen v. Reese

Filing 920090105

Opinion

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-60022 Summary Calendar January 5, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk JASON BOWEN Petitioner-Appellant v. CONSTANCE REESE, Warden Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:07-CV-48 Before HIGGIBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jason Bowen, federal prisoner # 09907-031, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Bowen alleged that he was subjected to and engaged in sexual activity with Tennessee prison officials and that drugs were planted in his cubicle. Bowen asserted that as a result of these incidents, he was confined in a special housing unit and subsequently was transferred to a prison in Mississippi. Bowen contends that because he is asserting that he is incarcerated in the wrong prison, § 2241 is the proper vehicle for his claims. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-60022 Because a favorable determination would not automatically entitle Bowen to accelerated release from custody, his claims do not arise under § 2241. See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 820­21 (5th Cir. 1997). Claims that have no relation to a prisoner's ultimate date of release from custody are not grounds for habeas relief. Malchi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 958­59 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?