USA v. Gonzalez-Molina
Filing
920091130
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
No. 09-10097 Summary Calendar November 30, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTONIO GONZALEZ-MOLINA, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-132-1
Before BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Antonio Gonzalez-Molina appeals his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Gonzalez-Molina contends that the district court committed plain error by applying a 16-level increase to his offense level based on its finding that his 2000 Pennsylvania conviction for aggravated assault was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). The Government concedes that neither the law nor the record establishes that
Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.
*
No. 09-10097 Gonzalez-Molina's prior conviction was a crime of violence for purposes of the enhancement and that it was plain error to increase Gonzalez-Molina's sentence based on that conviction. After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we agree that the district court committed plain error by using Gonzalez-Molina's Pennsylvania aggravated-assault conviction to increase his sentence. See United States v. Fierro-Reyna, 466 F.3d 324, 327-29 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Alfaro, 408 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we vacate Gonzalez-Molina's
sentence and remand for resentencing. See Alfaro, 408 F.3d at 211. CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?