USA v. Pulliro

Filing 920091006

REVISED October 6, 2009 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 09-20032 Summary Calendar

FILED
September 21, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee v. MATIAS MAURICIO STRACKE PULLIRO, also known as Mauricio Matias Stracke, also known as Matias Mauricio Stracks, also known as Matias Mauricio Stracke-Pulliro, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-567-ALL

Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Matias Mauricio Stracke Pulliro pled guilty to having been found unlawfully present in the United States subsequent to a prior conviction. He was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment and a three-year term of supervised release. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

No. 09-20032 In his sole issue on appeal, Pulliro argues that the district court erred in finding that his 2005 Texas conviction for arson was a crime of violence for purposes of the 16-level enhancement provided for by U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). He maintains that because the Texas statute (TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 28.02 (Vernon 2003)) does not require intended harm to a person for a conviction, it is broader than the common-law definition of arson. This court recently rejected this same argument in United States v. Velez-Alderete, 569 F.3d 541, 544-46 (5th Cir. 2009). In light of our holding in Velez-Alderete, the district court did not err in applying Section 2L1.2's 16-level enhancement based on Pulliro's prior Texas arson conviction. AFFIRMED.

2