USA v. Jaime Castro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [09-20573 Dismissed as frivolous ] Judge: JES , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 11/16/2010 for Appellant Jaime Vigil Castro; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Ms. Laura Fletcher Leavitt for Appellant Mr. Jaime Vigil Castro [6531262-2] [09-20573]

Download PDF
USA v. Jaime Castro ase: 09-20573 C Document: 00511274700 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 Doc. 0 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED N o . 09-20573 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar October 26, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. J A I M E VIGIL CASTRO, also known as Juan Perez Acosta, also known as Jaime V ig il-C a s t r o , also known as Jaime Vigil-Tobara, also known as Jaime Tobara V ig il, also known as Jaime Vigil Tobara, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 4:09-CR-102-1 B e fo r e SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Vigil Castro h a s moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v . California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castro has not filed a response. Our in d e p e n d e n t review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous is s u e for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-20573 Document: 00511274700 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 No. 09-20573 G R A N T E D , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the A P P E A L IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?