USA v. Jose Garcia

Filing 511141126

Case: 09-20656

Document: 00511141126

Page: 1

Date Filed: 06/14/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 09-20656 S u m m a r y Calendar June 14, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

U N I T E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in tiff-A p p e lle e v. J O S E ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ GARCIA, also known as Jose De Jesus Leba, a ls o known as Ricardo Campos, also known as Jose M. Cortez-Cortez, also k n o w n as Jose D. Leba, also known as Nelson Flores, also known as Jose Cortez, a ls o known as Abel P. Vasquez, also known as Jose Cortez-Martin, also known a s Jose Alfonso Rodriguez-Garcia, also known as Oscar Rolando Perez, also k n o w n as Jose Martin Cortez-Cortez, also known as Jose Elberto Garcia, also k n o w n as Jose Heriberto Garcia-Rodriguez, also known as Jose Heriberto R o d r ig u e z -G a r c ia , also known as Oscar Ramirez-Perez, also known as Jose E d e l b e r t o Garcia, also known as Abel Vasquez-Teaz, also known as Jose Alfonso R o d r ig u e z , also known as Francisco Garcia, also known as Jose Edilberto R o d r ig u e z - G a r c ia , also known as Jose Garcia, also known as Jose Rodriguez G a r c ia , also known as Oscar Rolando Ramirez-Perez, also known as Jose R o d rig u e z -G a r c ia , D e fe n d a n t-A p p e lla n t

A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 4:09-CR-236-1

Case: 09-20656

Document: 00511141126 Page: 2 No. 09-20656

Date Filed: 06/14/2010

B e fo r e DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alfonso R o d r ig u e z Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in a cc o r d a n c e with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses n o nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to w it h d r a w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

*

2