USA v. Julio Gonzales
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [09-20809 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 11/16/2010 for Appellant Julio Cesar Ortega Gonzales; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Mr. Andrew J. Williams for Appellant Mr. Julio Cesar Ortega Gonzales [6494060-2] [09-20809]
USA v. Julio Gonzalesase: 09-20809 C
Document: 00511274085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Doc. 0
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 09-20809 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar October 26, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. J U L I O CESAR ORTEGA GONZALES, also known as Julio Cesar Ortega, also k n o w n as Julio Ortega, also known as Julio Cesar Ortega-Gonzalez, also known a s Julio Cesar Ortega-Gonzeles,
Defendant-Appellant
A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 4:09-CR-415-1
B e fo r e SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Ortega Gonzales (Ortega) h a s moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v . California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortega has filed a response. Our
in d e p e n d e n t review of the record, counsel's brief, and Ortega's response discloses n o nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-20809 Document: 00511274085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 No. 09-20809 w it h d r a w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?