USA v. Garrett Wilson


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [09-30880 Affirmed, 09-30881 Affirmed, 09-30904 Affirmed, 09-30943 Affirmed] Judge: EMG , Judge: JLD. Mandate pull date is 01/04/2012 for Appellants Garrett Gene Wilson, Alan Victor Lee, Winfred Randolph Johnston Jr., William Montgomery Rodes Jr. [09-30880, 09-30881, 09-30904, 09-30943]

Download PDF
Case: 09-30880 Document: 00511695206 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/14/2011 United States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK LYLE W. CAYCE CLERK TEL. 504-310-7700 600 S. MAESTRI PLACE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 December 14, 2011 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc Nos. 09-30880, USA v. Garrett Wilson USDC No. 5:08-CR-379-4 09-30881, USA v. Alan Victor Lee USDC No. 5:08-CR-379-5 09-30904, USA v. Winfred Randolph Johnston, Jr. USDC No. 5:08-CR-379-1 09-30943, USA v. William Montgomery Rodes, Jr. USDC No. 5:08-CR-379-2 --------------------------------------------------Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered judgment under FED. R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to correction.) FED. R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH CIR. RULES 35, 39, and 41 govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH CIR. RULES 35 and 40 require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED. R. APP. P. 40 and 5TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc. Direct Criminal Appeals. 5TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for a stay of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately. Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay of mandate under FED. R. APP. P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court. Case: 09-30880 Document: 00511695206 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/14/2011 Sincerely, LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk By:_________________________ Jamei R. Cheramie, Deputy Clerk Enclosure(s) Mr. Christopher Albert Aberle Ms. Josette Louise Cassiere Mr. Billy James Guin Jr. Mr. Douglas Lee Harville Mr. Stephen H. Shapiro Mr. Alexander Coker Van Hook

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?