USA v. Gilberto Rueda
Filing
USA v. Gilberto Rueda
Doc. 0
Case: 09-40884
Document: 00511205492
Page: 1
Date Filed: 08/17/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 09-40884 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar August 17, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. G I L B E R T O RUEDA, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t
A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Eastern District of Texas U S D C No. 1:08-CR-112-1
B e fo r e DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto Rueda has m o v e d for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C a lifo r n ia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rueda has filed a response. The record is in s u ffic ie n t ly developed to allow consideration at this time of Rueda's claims of in e ffe c t iv e assistance of counsel; such claims generally "cannot be resolved on d ir e c t appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no o p p o r t u n it y existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations."
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-40884
Document: 00511205492 Page: 2 No. 09-40884
Date Filed: 08/17/2010
U n ite d States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal q u o t a t io n marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, c o u n s e l's brief, and Rueda's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused fr o m further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?