USA v. Victor Sevya


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [09-41045 Dismissed as frivolous ] Judge: JES , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 11/16/2010 for Appellant Victor Calbral Sevya; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Ms. Laura Fletcher Leavitt for Appellant Mr. Victor Calbral Sevya [6498408-2] [09-41045]

Download PDF
USA v. Victor SevyaCase: 09-41045 Document: 00511275087 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 Doc. 0 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED N o . 09-41045 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar October 26, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. V I C T O R CALBRAL SEVYA, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Texas U S D C No. 5:09-CR-1111-1 B e fo r e SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Calbral Sevya (C a lb r a l) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance w it h Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Calbral has not filed a response. He has recently been released from imprisonment and removed from the United S ta te s . O u r independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no n o n fr iv o lo u s issue for appeal. * Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 09-41045 Document: 00511275087 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 No. 09-41045 w it h d r a w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th C ir . 2007). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?