USA v. Mark Cloud

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ORDER FILED. [09-50718 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: JES , Judge: JLD , Judge: EBC Mandate pull date is 11/16/2010 for Appellant Mark David Cloud; mooting motion to relieve attorney filed by Appellant Mr. Mark David Cloud [6552168-2]; denying motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Mark David Cloud [6552168-3]; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Mr. William W. Torrey for Appellant Mr. Mark David Cloud [6449799-2] [09-50718]

Download PDF
USA v. Mark Cloud Case: 09-50718 Document: 00511274357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 Doc. 0 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED N o . 09-50718 C o n fe r e n c e Calendar October 26, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. M A R K DAVID CLOUD, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Western District of Texas U S D C No. 6:09-CR-66-1 B e fo r e SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* T h e attorney appointed to represent Mark David Cloud has moved for le a v e to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 3 8 6 U.S. 738 (1967). Cloud has filed a response. Our independent review of the r e c o r d , counsel's brief, and Cloud's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for a p p e a l. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, c o u n s e l is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-50718 Document: 00511274357 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010 No. 09-50718 D I S M IS S E D . See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Cloud's motion for appointment of substitute c o u n s e l is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?