USA v. Marco Martinez-Puente
Filing
USA v. Marco Martinez-Puente
Doc. 0
Case: 09-51099
Document: 00511221686
Page: 1
Date Filed: 09/01/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED
N o . 09-51099 S u m m a r y Calendar September 1, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, P la in t if f -A p p e lle e v. M A R C O ANTONIO MARTINEZ-PUENTE, D e fe n d a n t -A p p e lla n t
A p p e a l from the United States District Court fo r the Western District of Texas U S D C No. 3:09-CR-1842-1
B e fo r e GARWOOD, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. P E R CURIAM:* M a r c o Antonio Martinez-Puente pled guilty to illegal reentry after d e p o r t a t io n . He was sentenced to 12 months of imprisonment, to be followed by o n e year of non-reporting supervised release. On appeal, Martinez-Puente a r g u e s only that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than n e c e s s a r y to accomplish the goals of sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-51099
Document: 00511221686 Page: 2 No. 09-51099
Date Filed: 09/01/2010
W e do not reach the merits of the issue that he presents.
Because
M a r t in e z -P u e n t e has prior to this date been released from federal custody and r e m o v e d from the United States, he is subject only to an undischarged term of s u p e r v is e d release. We cannot grant what he requests because resentencing w o u ld require Martinez-Puente to be present at a hearing to consider a new s e n t e n c e ; his deportation creates a legal bar to such an appearance. United S t a t e s v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 2007). This appeal t h e r e fo r e has become moot. T h e appeal is DISMISSED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?